Effective manuscript revision responses: Best practices for turning feedback into publication success

Authors

  • M Mostafa Zaman Department of Public Health and Informatics, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1736-1342
  • Tanvir C Turin Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v18i3.84659

Keywords:

peer review, author response, dealing with editors, dealing with reviewers

Abstract

Not applicable

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
95
Article text
10 PDF
53

References

Kelly J, Sadeghieh T, Adeli K. Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. EJIFCC. 2014 Oct 24;25(3):227-243. PMID: 27683470

Drozdz JA, Ladomery MR. The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future. Br J Biomed Sci. 2024 Jun 17;81:12054. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.12054

Elsevier. Reviewer Hub, 2024. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/introducing-reviewer-hub [Accessed on 29 September 2025]

SAGE Publishing. Reviewer benefits, 2022. Available from: https://www.sagepub.com/journals/information-for-reviewers/reviewer-benefits [Accessed on 29 September 2025]

BMJ Open. Instructions for reviewers, 2025. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/pages/reviewer-guidelines [Accessed on 29 September 2025]

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

M Mostafa Zaman, & Turin, T. C. (2025). Effective manuscript revision responses: Best practices for turning feedback into publication success. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal, 18(3), e84659. https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v18i3.84659

Issue

Section

Editorial

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.