Research ethics: Overcoming the exploitative dynamic through ethical research

Authors

  • Tanvir C Turin Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-5050
  • Mohammad Raihan Department of Community Health Science, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9945-1535
  • Meriem Aroua Department of Community Health Science, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-9031
  • Nashit Chowdhury Department of Community Health Science, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1067-4450

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v18i2.79016

Keywords:

research ethics, explorative dynamics

Abstract

Research ethics is a framework of principles and guidelines designed to ensure that scientific inquiry protects participants’ rights and welfare while upholding integrity. Core principles includes respect for persons, beneficence, and justice which govern all research stages. Respect for persons requires informed consent, confidentiality, and additional safeguards for individuals with diminished autonomy. Beneficence involves maximizing benefits and minimizing harm. Justice demands equitable distribution of both research burdens and benefits. Despite these safeguards, exploitative dynamics persist when power imbalances enable researchers to pursue agendas at the expense of marginalized communities. Such dynamics manifest as tokenistic participation, extractive “helicopter” research, lack of reciprocity, disregard for local context, and unaddressed harms, all of which erode trust and compromise research validity. Mitigating these issues for ensuring ethical research requires proactive strategies at both the investigator and institutional levels. Researchers should co-design studies with community partners, implement participant-centered informed consent, ensure fair recruitment, prioritize participant welfare, establish benefit-sharing agreements, and maintain transparency and accountability. Academic institutions must bolster ethics infrastructures — streamlining review processes, providing ongoing ethics training, facilitating genuine community engagement, and fostering a culture that rewards ethical conduct. By embedding these measures into research design and oversight, the research community can prevent exploitation, honour participants’ dignity, and advance knowledge in an equitable manner. Upholding rigorous ethical standards not only safeguards scientific credibility but also builds public trust and contributes to a more just and inclusive society. 

Downloads

Abstract
152
Article text
14 PDF
25

References

U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Bethesda (MD): National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research; 1979. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html. Accessed on 2nd February 2025

Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Ottawa (ON): Government of Canada; 2022. Available from: https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2022.html. Accessed on 2nd February 2025

Sierra X. Ethics in medical research in humans: a historical perspective. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2011;102:395–401. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2011.03.016

Moon MR. The history and role of institutional review boards: A useful tension. AMA J. Ethics. 2009;11:311–316. Available from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/sites/joedb/files/2018-06/pfor1-0904_0.pdf

World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Fortaleza, Brazil: WMA General Assembly; 2013. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/ (Accessed on 7th February 2025)

Vanclay F, Baines JT, Taylor CN. Principles for ethical research involving humans: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 2013;31:243–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.850307

Resnik DB. What is ethics in research and why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. 2011. Available from: http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis (Accessed on 7th February 2025)

Ayrton R. Power dynamics between researcher and subject. In: Cyr J, Goodman SW, editors. Doing Good Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press; 2024:132–144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197633137.003.0012

Turin TC, Chowdhury N, Haque S, Rumana N, Rahman N, Lasker MAA. Involving im/migrant community members for knowledge co-creation: the greater the desired involvement, the greater the need for capacity building. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e007602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007602

Turin TC, Chowdhury N, Haque S, Rumana N, Rahman N, Lasker MAA. Meaningful and deep community engagement efforts for pragmatic research and beyond: engaging with an immigrant/racialised community on equitable access to care. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e006370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006370

Published

2025-05-14

How to Cite

Turin, T. C., Raihan, M., Aroua, M., & Chowdhury, N. (2025). Research ethics: Overcoming the exploitative dynamic through ethical research. Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Journal, 18(2), e79016. https://doi.org/10.3329/bsmmuj.v18i2.79016

Issue

Section

Methods Article

Similar Articles

1 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.