Inter and intra maxillary elastic have impact on orthodontic management - a systematic review and meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v24i3.82965Keywords:
United Arab Emirates.Abstract
Objectives: The study aimed to compare the effects of intermaxillary elastics (IMEs) and intramaxillary elastics (IAEs) in orthodontic treatment and provide evidence-based recommendations for their usage. Eligibility criteria: Articles that examined the effects of IMEs and IAEs in orthodontic treatment were considered. A total of 10 papers, 5 for each type of elastic, were included in the final analysis. Information sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched to identify relevant articles. Risk of bias: Cochrane’s risk of bias tool was utilised for the assessment of the risk of bias. Included studies: Ten papers were included in the study, with 5 each focused on IMEs and IAEs. Both types of elastics were found to be associated with significant improvements in orthodontic management. The OR for noticeable vs negligible impact was 0.44 for IMEs and 0.48 for IAEs, indicating a significant association. Synthesis of results: A meta-analysis was conducted, and forest plots were generated to assess the odds ratio (OR) for IMEs and IAEs separately. The analysis showed a positive correlation between the use of both types of elastics and orthodontic management. One study indicated that appliance therapy was slightly more effective than IAEs. The forest plot for IMEs showed no significant heterogeneity, while the plot for IAEs showed moderate heterogeneity. The findings suggest that both IMEs and IAEs are viable options for orthodontic management, although some heterogeneity was observed in the studies regarding IAEs. Limitations of evidence: The review was limited to studies published in the English language, which could have led to the exclusion of relevant studies published in other languages. Also, the review only included studies published from 2013 onwards, which could have resulted in the exclusion of relevant older studies. Interpretation: The study’s results support the use of both IMEs and IAEs in orthodontic treatment, indicating their positive effects. Further research may be needed to address the observed heterogeneity in studies focusing on IAEs. Registration and protocol: The research protocol was developed and registered with PROSPERO [CRD42023405593]. The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines for the search and inclusion of relevant articles.
BJMS, Vol. 24 No. 03 July’25 Page : 995-1006
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad Khursheed Alam , Huda Abutayyem , Maher AL Shayeb , Maysara Adnan Ibrahim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in the Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science agree to the following terms that:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science the right of first publication of the work.
Articles in Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY-4.0.This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as greater citation of published work.