Studies on Toothbrushes Contaminated by Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients and it’s Disinfection Procedures: A Cross-Sectional Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3329/updcj.v15i1.80302Keywords:
Toothbrush disinfection, Microbial contaminationAbstract
Background: Toothbrushes act as reservoirs for microbial contamination and are essential for maintaining human oral hygiene. Diabetic individuals are at a higher risk of contamination due to compromised immune responses. This study evaluates bacteria contamination and the efficacy of different disinfection methods for toothbrushes used by diabetic and non-diabetic individuals.
Methods: A cross-sectional study and clinical trial were conducted among 120 participants (60 diabetic and 60 nondiabetic). Used toothbrushes were collected and divided into control and experimental groups and subjected to disinfection using 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), vinegar, and tap water. Bacterial cultures were performed using MacConkey agar and blood agar. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 21).
Results: Toothbrushes used by diabetic individuals exhibited significantly higher microbial contamination than those used by non-diabetic individuals. Here the most prevalent bacterial isolates were Streptococcus mutans (60% in diabetics vs. 46.6% in non-diabetics), Staphylococcus aureus (43.8% vs. 55%), Pseudomonas spp. (78.3% vs. 38.3%), and Escherichia coli (71.6% vs. 58.3%). Among the tested disinfectants, 5% NaOCl demonstrated the highest disinfection efficacy (100%), followed by 2% CHX (85%) and vinegar (65%). Tap water failed to reduce microbial load effectively (10%).
Conclusion: Toothbrushes of diabetic individuals are significantly more contaminated than those of non-diabetic individuals, increasing the risk of oral and systemic infections. Disinfection with 5% NaOCl or 2% CHX effectively reduces microbial contamination and should be recommended as routine practice. Further studies are needed to explore additional disinfection methods and their long-term efficacy.
Update Dent. Coll. j: 2025; 15(1): 28-32
Downloads
33
21
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shaheen Ahamed, Khandker Md. Faisal Alam, S. M. Shahinul Islam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
licensing, and copyright:
Articles in Update Dental College Journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY-4.0. This license permits
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the following license terms.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.