Percutaneous Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Suturing Versus Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Suturing in Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children

Authors

  • Nayeem Hasan Registrar, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Dhaka Medical College, Bangladesh
  • Tahmina Hossain Professor, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Dhaka Medical College, Bangladesh
  • A H M Abdul Hai Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Dhaka Medical College, Bangladesh
  • Gazi Mahmud Ul Hasan Assistant Registrar, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Dhaka Medical College, Bangladesh
  • Ashekin Abir Registrar, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Dhaka Medical College, Bangladesh
  • Pankaj Mohanta Indoor Medical Officer, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Dhaka Medical College, Bangladesh
  • S M Nazmus Shakib Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Dhaka Medical College, Bangladesh
  • Md Tazmir Mahamud Registrar, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Dhaka Medical College, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/jpsb.v15i1.89132

Keywords:

Pediatric inguinal hernia, laparoscopy, intracorporeal suturing, extracorporeal suturing, minimally invasive surgery

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has become an increasingly accepted approach in paediatric surgery. Among the minimally invasive techniques, intracorporeal suturing and percutaneous extracorporeal suturing are widely practiced, yet debate remains regarding their comparative outcomes.

Objective: To compare the outcomes of intracorporeal suturing and percutaneous extracorporeal suturing techniques in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children.

Methods: This study was conducted in the Department of Paediatric Surgery, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, from September 2022 to February 2024. A total of 131 male children aged 2–12 years with clinically diagnosed inguinal hernia were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (intracorporeal suturing, n=65) and Group B (extracorporeal suturing, n=66). Operative time, per‑operative and post‑operative complications, and short‑term outcomes were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS.

Results: The mean age of patients was comparable between the two group, mean age was 6.22 ± 1.90 years in Group A and 6.05 ± 2.53 years in Group B, showing no statistically significant difference. The mean duration of surgery was significantly longer in Group A compared to Group B (p<0.001). No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding intra‑operative complications, postoperative hydrocele, testicular atrophy, or recurrence during follow‑up. Both techniques were found to be safe and effective.

Conclusion: Percutaneous extracorporeal suturing is a safe, effective, and time‑saving alternative to intracorporeal suturing in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children, with comparable complication rates and favourable outcomes.

Journal of Paediatric Surgeons of Bangladesh (2024) Vol. 15 (1 & 2): 29-32

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
0
PDF
0

Downloads

Published

2026-04-26

How to Cite

Nayeem Hasan, Tahmina Hossain, A H M Abdul Hai, Gazi Mahmud Ul Hasan, Ashekin Abir, Pankaj Mohanta, … Md Tazmir Mahamud. (2026). Percutaneous Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Suturing Versus Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Suturing in Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children. Journal of Paediatric Surgeons of Bangladesh, 15(1), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.3329/jpsb.v15i1.89132

Issue

Section

Original Articles