Intrauterine Misoprostol Versus Intravenous Oxytocin for the Prevention of Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage During Cesarean Section: A One-Year Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

  • Kamrun Naher Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Eastern Medical College & Hospital, Cumilla, Bangladesh.
  • Akterun Nahar Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Comilla Medical College & Hospital, Cumilla, Bangladesh.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/emcj.v10i2.85706

Keywords:

Intrauterine Misoprostol, Intravenous Oxytocin, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Cesarean Section, Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the major cause of maternal death worldwide, significantly in poor countries, like Asia, Africa. In our country PPH is the major cause of maternal mortality (about 80%). Global studies for decades showed that maternal mortality following PPH is due to uterine atony following vaginal delivery, caesarean section delivery and use of uterotonic drugs are the choice for both prevention and treatment of PPH. This study aims to evaluate the use and efficacy of intrauterine misoprostol versus oxytocin alone, in controlling postpartum haemorrhage due to atonic uterus amongst women with undergone Caesarean section in a tertiary care hospital setting of Bangladesh.

Material and Methods: This randomized clinical trial was done in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Eastern Medical college Hospital, Cumilla, Bangladesh between January 2022 to December 2022. A total of 100 participants were randomly selected from all patients who admitted for elective cesarean section within this period. In this, the study group (Group A=50), received only intrauterine misoprostol after placental delivery. On the other hand, in control group (Group B=50) received routine intravenous Oxytocin alone.

Results: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Group A (misoprostol) showed significantly lower preoperative, post-operative, and total blood loss compared to Group B (oxytocin). Post-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were significantly higher in Group A (p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). Additionally, Group A required fewer additional uterotonics and had a lower incidence of side effects, with no major differences in the type of adverse effects between the groups.

Conclusion: This study concluded that intrauterine misoprostol is more effective than intravenous oxytocin in reducing blood loss and maintaining better postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels during cesarean section, with fewer additional uterotonic requirements and minimal side effects.

Eastern Med Coll J. July 2025; 10 (2): 111-115

Abstract
20
PDF
11

Downloads

Published

2026-01-19

How to Cite

Kamrun Naher, & Akterun Nahar. (2026). Intrauterine Misoprostol Versus Intravenous Oxytocin for the Prevention of Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage During Cesarean Section: A One-Year Randomized Controlled Trial. Eastern Medical College Journal , 10(2), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.3329/emcj.v10i2.85706

Issue

Section

Original Article