Personalised gait training versus standard gait training programme among patients with stroke: A randomised controlled trial
Keywords:
stroke, personalised gait training, standard gait training, functional mobility, randomised controlled trialAbstract
Background: Gait asymmetry after stroke can limit mobility and independence. Standard gait training may improve walking performance but may not address individual biomechanical deficits such as stance-phase asymmetry. This study aimed to compare personalised gait training (PGT) guided by real-time stance-phase analysis with standard gait training (SGT) in adults with subacute stroke.
Methods: This randomised controlled trial included 120 adults aged 45–75 years with first-ever ischaemic stroke and moderate gait impairment. Participants were randomised 1:1 to PGT or SGT and received 45-minute sessions, five days per week for 12 weeks. PGT used instrumented insoles providing real-time feedback, with progression based on stance-phase symmetry. The primary outcome was Functional Independence Measure (FIM) locomotion at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included gait speed, Berg Balance Scale, stance-phase symmetry ratio (SPSR), and independent ambulation.
Results: At 12 weeks, mean (standard deviation (SD)) FIM locomotion increased from 4.2 (1.3) to 6.6 (1.1) with PGT and from 4.0 (1.4) to 5.3 (1.4) with SGT, with a between-group difference of 1.3 points (95% CI 0.8–1.7; P <0.05; Cohen’s d=1.03). At 12 weeks, PGT also showed higher gait speed (0.94 (0.24) vs 0.68 (0.21) m/s), Berg Balance Scale score (50.2 (5.8) vs 42.8 (7.6)), and SPSR (1.02 (0.1) vs 0.9 (0.1)). Independent ambulation was achieved by 78% participants with PGT compared with 53% with SGT (OR=3.2, 95% CI 1.5–7.2). Time to independent ambulation was 2.3 weeks shorter with PGT (95% CI 1.5–3.1).
Conclusion: Personalised stance-phase-guided gait training can improve functional mobility, gait performance, and independent ambulation compared with standard gait training in adults with subacute stroke.
776
18 PDF
72 Review report
12
References
GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0
Xu J, Witchalls J, Preston E, Pan L, Waddington G, Adams R, Han J. Stroke-related factors associated with gait asymmetry in ambulatory stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture. 2025 Sep;121:173-181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.05.010
Mizuta N, Hasui N, Higa Y, Matsunaga A, Ohnishi S, Sato Y, Nakatani T, Taguchi J, Morioka S. Identifying impairments and compensatory strategies for temporal gait asymmetry in post-stroke persons. Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):2704. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86167-9
Li X, He Y, Wang D, Rezaei MJ. Stroke rehabilitation: from diagnosis to therapy. Front Neurol. 2024 Aug 13;15:1402729. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1402729
Lee MH, Lee DY. Effects of Task-Oriented Training on Gait Outcomes and Balance in Individuals with Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Med. 2025 Dec 11;14(24):8766. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14248766
Lee JH, Kim G. Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 7;14(13):4809. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134809
Wang FY, Xu Y, Luo LY, Liang HB, Jiang YP, Bai ZQ, Huang MZ, Wong AY, Yang L, Zhang M, Yang YH, Ma CZ. Can wearable real-time biofeedback gait training devices improve gait speed, balance, functional mobility and activities of daily living (ADL) in individuals post-stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Dec 28;23(1):47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01863-x
Hwang S, Song CS. Assistive Technology Involving Postural Control and Gait Performance for Adults with Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 7;11(15):2225. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11152225
Tate JJ, Milner CE. Real-time kinematic, temporospatial, and kinetic biofeedback during gait retraining in patients: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2010 Aug;90(8):1123-1134. doi: https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080281
Winterbottom L, Nilsen DM. Motor Learning Following Stroke: Mechanisms of Learning and Techniques to Augment Neuroplasticity. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2024 May;35(2):277-291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2023.06.004
Hopewell S, Chan AW, Collins GS, Hróbjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, Tunn R, Aggarwal R, Berkwits M, Berlin JA, Bhandari N, Butcher NJ, Campbell MK, Chidebe RCW, Elbourne D, Farmer A, Fergusson DA, Golub RM, Goodman SN, Hoffmann TC, Ioannidis JPA, Kahan BC, Knowles RL, Lamb SE, Lewis S, Loder E, Offringa M, Ravaud P, Richards DP, Rockhold FW, Schriger DL, Siegfried NL, Staniszewska S, Taylor RS, Thabane L, Torgerson D, Vohra S, White IR, Boutron I. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. BMJ. 2025 Apr 14;389:e081123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081123
Yu Y, Huang W, Tuerxun H, Zheng Y, Su L, Li X, Dou Z. Enhanced neuroplasticity and gait recovery in stroke patients: a comparative analysis of active and passive robotic training modes. BMC Neurol. 2025 May 31;25(1):239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-025-04226-0
Thimabut N, Yotnuengnit P, Charoenlimprasert J, Sillapachai T, Hirano S, Saitoh E, Piravej K. Effects of the Robot-Assisted Gait Training Device Plus Physiotherapy in Improving Ambulatory Functions in Patients With Subacute Stroke With Hemiplegia: An Assessor-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 May;103(5):843-850. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.01.146
Cedin L, Knowlton C, Wimmer M Real-Time Musical Feedback From Pressure-Sensing Insoles For Asymmetric Gait Retraining Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 31, S81-S82, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2023.01.024
Ghazavi Dozin SM, Mohammad Rahimi N, Aminzadeh R. Wii Fit-Based Biofeedback Rehabilitation Among Post-Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial. Biol Res Nurs. 2024 Jan;26(1):5-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004231180316
Mehrholz J, Kugler J, Pohl M, Elsner B. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 14;5(5):CD006185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006185
Wong MN, Cheung MK, Ng YM, Yuan HL, Lam BY, Fu SN, Chan CCH. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health-based rehabilitation program promotes activity and participation of post-stroke patients. Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 3;14:1235500. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1235500
Tariq S, Waris A, Iqbal J, Khan NB, Gilani SO, Mushtaq S, Awais Q, Mushtaq K. Evaluation of balance and orthotic gait training techniques for rehabilitation in hemiplegic stroke patients. Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):15059. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98227-1
Dai K, Yang Y, Yang Y. Effects of Gait Biofeedback Training on Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters in Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Brain Sciences. 2026; 16(7):717. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16070717
Lovecchio, N., Zago, M., Sforza, C. (2021). Gait Analysis in the Rehabilitation Process. In: Lopresti, M., Panella, L. (eds) Rehabilitation After Limb Salvage Surgery. Springer, Cham. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66352-0_13
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Janani Muthusamy, Balamurugan Janakiraman, Vijayaraj Vediappan, Mahesh Kumar P G, Parthasarathy Ranganathan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
