Modified Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children

Authors

  • N Shilanbayev JSC «Scientific Center of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery», Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • A Dzhumabekov Kazakhstan Medical University «Higher School of Public Health», Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • A Kussainov NJSC «Kazakh National Medical University named after S.D. Asfendiyarov», Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • G Altynbayeva NJSC «Kazakh National Medical University named after S.D. Asfendiyarov», Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • K Khairov JSC «Scientific Center of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery», Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • A Orazalinov City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • K Ashirbay JSC «Scientific Center of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery», Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • M Kalabayeva Kazakhstan Medical University «Higher School of Public Health», Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • A Ayapova City Clinical Hospital No. 7, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • E Aitbayeva Al-Farabi Kazakh National University», Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • S Saliyeva JSC «Scientific Center of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery», Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • A A Rakhmatullaev Tashkent State Medical University – Tashkent Medical Academy

Keywords:

gastrostomy; dysphagia; PEG; nutritional support.

Abstract

Background Gastrostomy is widely used to provide long-term enteral nutrition for children with severe nutritional disorders. However, the optimal method of gastrostomy placement remains controversial, as each method has its advantages and potential complications. In recent years, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has gained increasing popularity due to its minimally invasive nature. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and complications associated with different gastrostomy techniques and to evaluate the safety of a modified Push-PEG method. Methods A retrospective single-center study included 120 pediatricpatients who underwent gastrostomy placement using four different techniques: open gastrostomy (OG), laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG), standard Push PEG, and modified Push- PEG. Patient demographics, operative time, length of hospital stay, indications for gastrostomy, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the groups. Results The main indication for gastrostomy placement was dysphagia (75%), followed by malnutrition (25%). The overall complication rate was 42.5%. No significant differences were found between the groups in the rate of minor complications (p = 0.630). However, significant differences were observed for major complications, with the highest rates seen after open and laparoscopic gastrostomy, and the lowest after the modified Push-PEG technique (p = 0.001). Conclusions The modified Push-PEG technique is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to surgical gastrostomy methods, reducing operative time, accelerating recovery, and decreasing the risk of major postoperative complications in pediatric patients.

Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol. 25 No. 03 July’26 Page: 880-886

Abstract
1
PDF
0

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Modified Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children. (2026). Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, 25(3), 880-886. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v25i3.90557

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Modified Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children. (2026). Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, 25(3), 880-886. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v25i3.90557