Influence of vermicompost and npk on the growth and protein content of boro rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Authors

  • KN Nishi Department of Soil, Water and Environment, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
  • S Rahman Department of Soil, Water and Environment, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
  • K Nakamura Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, NARO, Kannondai 3-1-3, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0035, Japan
  • MK Rahman Department of Soil, Water and Environment, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh

Keywords:

Boro Rice; Vermicompost; Growth; Biomass production; NPK; Protein content

Abstract

Influence of vermicompost (2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10 ton/ha), Nitrogen (12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 kg/ha), phosphorus (4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 kg/ha) and potassium (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 kg/ha) on the growth and protein contents of Boro rice (Oriza sativa L.) was examined. Highest height (93.03cm), leaf number (23 no/plant), highest productive plants observed (8.67 no/pot), vegetative plants (8.0 no/pot), dry weight of panicle per plant (9.45 g), length of panicle (22.37 cm), number of grains per panicle (153.33),1000-grain weight (21.56 g) and the maximum dry weight (28.15 g/plant) were observed in VC10 ton/ha + N12P4K10 kg/ha treatments. Highest concentrations of protein content (29.875%), P (0.478%), K (5.20%) and S (0.182%) were in N60P20K50 kg/ha. Results showed that the overall best growth performance and yield were achieved in VC10 ton/ha + N12P4K10 kg/ha treatments.

J. Biodivers. Conserv. Bioresour. Manag. 2019, 5(2): 69-74

Abstract
200
PDF
240

Downloads

Published

2020-01-15

How to Cite

Influence of vermicompost and npk on the growth and protein content of boro rice (Oryza sativa L.). (2020). Journal of Biodiversity Conservation and Bioresource Management, 5(2), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcbm.v5i2.44916

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Influence of vermicompost and npk on the growth and protein content of boro rice (Oryza sativa L.). (2020). Journal of Biodiversity Conservation and Bioresource Management, 5(2), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcbm.v5i2.44916