Outcome of Flexible and Semirigid Ureteroscopy in the Management of Proximal Ureteral Stones Using Laser Lithotripsy

Authors

  • Muhammad Asaduzzaman Senior Consultant, Department of Urology, Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka
  • AKM Fazlay Rabbi Khan Junior Consultant, Department of Urology, Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka
  • Fatima Farhana Assistant Professor, Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Comilla Medical College, Cumilla
  • Sharif Muhammad Mahmudul Hasan Majumder Registrar, Department of Urology, Comilla Medical College & Hospital, Cumilla
  • A B Siddiq Assistant Professor, Department of Urology, Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka

Keywords:

Proximal ureteral stones, Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, semi-rigid ureteroscopy

Abstract

Background: Proximal ureteric stone often poses therapeutic challenges to urological surgeons. Currently, management of ureteric stone is highly successful with Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy using flexible and semi-rigid ureteroscope.

Objectives: The objective of the study to evaluate comparative clinical efficacy and safety of flexible and semi-rigid ureteroscopy combined with Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy for treating proximal ureteral stone in real-world settings.

Methods: This study was conducted as a clinical trial. A total of 82 patients were included in the study through purposive sampling and divided into two comparison groups: Group A (Flexible ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy) and group B (Semi-rigid ureteroscopy using laser lithotripsy). Follow-up visits were conducted at 1 and 3 month post-operatively to track the stone clearance rate and post-operative complications (hematuria, migration of stone, mucosal disruption, and ureteral stricture). Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 21, and the chi-square test was used to compare percentages of different outcome variables. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Among 82 prospective cases, 22 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 60 patients for final analysis; 75% of patients were males and 25% of them were females, mean of age were 36.21±12.58 and 34.94±10.23 years, respectively ranging from 19 to 65 years, with laterality of 57.1% and 53.1% (Group A and Group B respectively) of patients were right but of 42.9% and 46.9% respectively were left. The mean operative time were 65.0±9.33 minutes and 55.25±11.46 minutes, respectively and mean duration of hospital stay (in both groups) was 51 hours. The mean ureteral stone diameter was 10.57 mm and 10.16 mm respectively. The clearance rate 89.3% and 65.6%.

Conclusion: Flexible ureteroscopy combined with laser lithotripsy is a highly effective option for treating proximal ureteral stones than semirigid ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy regarding superior stone-free rates.

J Com Med Col Teachers’ Asso July 2025; 29(2): 127-132

Abstract
0
PDF
0

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Outcome of Flexible and Semirigid Ureteroscopy in the Management of Proximal Ureteral Stones Using Laser Lithotripsy. (2025). Journal of Comilla Medical College Teachers’ Association , 29(2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.3329/jcomcta.v29i2.86036

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

Outcome of Flexible and Semirigid Ureteroscopy in the Management of Proximal Ureteral Stones Using Laser Lithotripsy. (2025). Journal of Comilla Medical College Teachers’ Association , 29(2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.3329/jcomcta.v29i2.86036