Comparative Study Between Outcome of Early and Conventional Catheter Removal After Transurethral Resection of Prostate

Authors

  • Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman Department of Urology, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Sudip Das Gupta Department of Urology, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Nazrul Islam Mridha Department of Urology, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Man Wahid Department of Urology, Sir Salimullah Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Farhana Begum Department of Anatomy, SSMC, Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3329/bju.v20i2.49660

Keywords:

TURP, BPH, Hospital stay, Color of effluent

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effect of early and conventional catheter removal after TURP.

Methods: The cases were selected from the admitted patients with BPH by using simple purposive sampling technique. Sixty (60) cases were included in the study fulfilling selection criteria of the patient and numbered chronologically according to their data and time of operation. Odd numbers of cases were included in group-A (n=30) for early catheter removal within 48 hours and even numbers of cases in group-B (n=30) for conventional catheter removal within 3-5 days.

Results: Postoperative hospital stay 47.12 (±7.92) hours in group A and 113.23(±10.8) hours were in group B (p<0.001) that was statistically highly significant.

Conclusion: Early catheter removal within 48 hours following Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) is safe. It reduces the catheter related morbidity and postoperative hospital stay.

Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 20, No. 2, July 2017 p.82-86

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
160
PDF
367

Downloads

Published

2020-10-11

How to Cite

Rahman, M. M., Gupta, S. D., Mridha, N. I., Wahid, M., & Begum, F. (2020). Comparative Study Between Outcome of Early and Conventional Catheter Removal After Transurethral Resection of Prostate. Bangladesh Journal of Urology, 20(2), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.3329/bju.v20i2.49660

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 2 (2017)

Section

Original Articles